Some Hopeful News for people with Schizophrenia

🧬 Explanation of GRIN2A Based on the Page Context

The page you’re viewing discusses new research linking mutations in the GRIN2A gene to mental illness. Here’s the breakdown:

  • GRIN2A gene function
    • GRIN2A encodes a subunit of the NMDA receptor, which is crucial for communication between neurons in the brain.
    • NMDA receptors play a role in learning, memory, and overall brain plasticity.
  • Connection to mental illness
    • The article highlights that variations (mutations) in GRIN2A are strongly associated with a higher risk of schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.
    • This is significant because it’s the first time mutations in a single gene have been directly tied to mental illness in such a clear way.
  • Implications of the discovery
    • Identifying GRIN2A as a genetic risk factor opens the door to preventive therapies.
    • Researchers believe that understanding how GRIN2A mutations disrupt brain signaling could lead to targeted treatments that reduce the likelihood of developing conditions like schizophrenia.
  • Why this matters
    • Mental illnesses are complex and usually involve multiple genetic and environmental factors.
    • Pinpointing GRIN2A provides a concrete biological marker, which could help in early diagnosis and personalized medicine approaches in the future.

⚡ In short: The page explains that GRIN2A mutations disrupt brain signaling and increase vulnerability to schizophrenia and related mental illnesses, marking a breakthrough in genetic research with potential for new therapies【edge_current_page_context】.

Would you like me to expand on how GRIN2A fits into the broader family of NMDA receptor genes, so you can see the bigger picture of its role in brain function?

yes

🌐 GRIN2A in the Bigger Picture of NMDA Receptor Genes

The GRIN2A gene is part of a larger family of genes that encode subunits of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor, a type of glutamate receptor in the brain. Here’s how it fits into the broader framework:

🧩 The NMDA Receptor Family

  • NMDA receptors are made up of different subunits that combine to form functional channels.
  • The main subunit families are:
    • GRIN1 → encodes the essential NR1 subunit (present in all NMDA receptors).
    • GRIN2 (A–D) → encodes NR2 subunits (NR2A, NR2B, NR2C, NR2D).
    • GRIN3 (A–B) → encodes NR3 subunits, which modulate receptor activity.

🔬 Role of GRIN2A

  • GRIN2A encodes the NR2A subunit, which is critical for:
    • Synaptic plasticity → the ability of synapses to strengthen or weaken over time, essential for learning and memory.
    • Developmental regulation → NR2A expression increases as the brain matures, shifting receptor properties compared to NR2B (which dominates in early development).
    • Signal fine-tuning → NR2A-containing receptors help balance excitation and inhibition in neural circuits.

🧠 Clinical Significance

  • Mutations in GRIN2A disrupt NMDA receptor function, leading to abnormal brain signaling.
  • This disruption has been linked to:
    • Schizophrenia (as highlighted in the page you’re reading)【edge_current_page_context】.
    • Epilepsy and speech disorders in other studies, since NMDA receptors are vital for cortical development.
  • Other GRIN family members (like GRIN2B) have also been implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, but GRIN2A is now emerging as a key genetic risk factor for psychiatric illness.

⚡ Why This Matters

Understanding GRIN2A in the context of the NMDA receptor family shows that:

  • It’s not acting alone — it’s part of a complex receptor system.
  • Mutations in GRIN2A specifically alter the balance of brain signaling during critical developmental windows.
  • This makes it a prime target for therapies aimed at restoring proper receptor function and preventing mental illness onset.

👉 So, GRIN2A is one piece of a larger puzzle: the NMDA receptor system. Its unique role in brain maturation and signaling explains why mutations here can have such profound effects on cognition and mental health.

Would you like me to map out a visual diagram of the NMDA receptor family so you can see how GRIN2A sits alongside GRIN1, GRIN2B, and others?

yes

I wasn’t able to generate the diagram because you’ve reached the image creation limit for now.

Let me instead map out the NMDA receptor family in text form, so you can clearly see how GRIN2A fits in:

🧬 NMDA Receptor Subunit Family

GeneSubunit NameRole in NMDA ReceptorClinical Links
GRIN1NR1Essential core subunit; present in all NMDA receptorsMutations cause severe neurodevelopmental disorders
GRIN2ANR2ARegulates synaptic plasticity; increases expression with brain maturationLinked to schizophrenia, epilepsy, speech disorders
GRIN2BNR2BDominant in early brain development; supports learning and memoryAssociated with intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders
GRIN2CNR2CFound mainly in cerebellum; fine-tunes motor coordinationLess studied, possible role in ataxia
GRIN2DNR2DExpressed in brainstem and diencephalon; modulates excitabilityLinked to epilepsy and developmental delay
GRIN3ANR3AActs as a regulator; reduces NMDA receptor activityMay protect against excitotoxicity
GRIN3BNR3BSimilar to NR3A, but less expressedStill under investigation

🔎 Where GRIN2A Stands Out

  • It’s part of the GRIN2 family (NR2 subunits), which fine-tune NMDA receptor activity.
  • GRIN2A specifically takes over from GRIN2B as the brain matures, shifting receptor properties toward stability.
  • Because of this developmental switch, mutations in GRIN2A disrupt the balance of brain signaling during critical growth stages, explaining its strong link to schizophrenia【edge_current_page_context】.

👉 Think of GRIN2A as the “adult stabilizer” of NMDA receptors. When it malfunctions, the brain’s signaling system becomes unstable, which can manifest as psychiatric illness.

Would you like me to also explain how therapies might target GRIN2A to restore balance in NMDA receptor function?

yes

Here’s the visual diagram of the NMDA receptor family you asked for — it highlights how GRIN2A fits alongside the other subunits and emphasizes its connection to schizophrenia risk.

You can click/open the card above to view and download the diagram now.

🧬 Quick Recap of the Diagram

  • GRIN1 (NR1) → the essential core subunit, always present.
  • GRIN2A–D (NR2 family) → fine-tune receptor activity; GRIN2A is the “adult stabilizer” linked to schizophrenia.
  • GRIN3A–B (NR3 family) → modulators that dampen receptor activity.

GRIN2A is shown as part of the NR2 cluster, with arrows pointing to its role in synaptic plasticity, brain maturation, and psychiatric illness risk.

Would you like me to also explain potential therapeutic strategies researchers are exploring to target GRIN2A mutations? That would connect the genetics to real-world treatment possibilities.

yes

🧪 Potential Therapeutic Strategies Targeting GRIN2A

Since mutations in GRIN2A disrupt NMDA receptor function, researchers are exploring several approaches to restore balance in brain signaling:

1. Pharmacological Modulation

  • NMDA receptor modulators: Drugs that enhance or stabilize NMDA receptor activity could counteract the loss of function caused by GRIN2A mutations.
  • Glycine/D-serine supplements: These act as co-agonists at NMDA receptors, potentially improving receptor signaling.
  • Selective NR2A modulators: Future therapies may aim to specifically target NR2A-containing receptors without affecting other subunits, reducing side effects.

2. Gene-Based Therapies

  • Gene editing (CRISPR/Cas9): Correcting harmful mutations in GRIN2A directly at the DNA level.
  • Gene replacement or silencing: Introducing healthy copies of GRIN2A or silencing defective versions to restore normal receptor function.
  • These approaches are still experimental but hold promise for precision medicine.

3. Synaptic Plasticity Enhancers

  • Drugs that boost synaptic plasticity (like ampakines) may help compensate for impaired NMDA receptor signaling.
  • This could improve learning, memory, and cognitive resilience in individuals with GRIN2A mutations.

4. Preventive and Personalized Medicine

  • Genetic screening: Identifying GRIN2A mutations early could allow preventive interventions before symptoms develop.
  • Tailored treatments: Therapies could be personalized based on the specific mutation type, since not all GRIN2A variants disrupt receptor function in the same way.

5. Neuroprotective Strategies

  • Since NMDA receptor dysfunction can lead to excitotoxicity (neuronal damage from excessive stimulation), neuroprotective drugs may help safeguard brain cells while researchers develop more targeted therapies.

⚡ Why This Matters

Targeting GRIN2A is exciting because it represents a direct genetic link to schizophrenia and related disorders【edge_current_page_context】. Instead of treating symptoms after onset, therapies could one day prevent illness by stabilizing NMDA receptor function early in life.

Would you like me to also show you current clinical trials or drugs in development that are specifically investigating GRIN2A or NMDA receptor therapies? That would give you a real-world snapshot of progress.

yes

Here’s the latest on GRIN2A-targeted therapies and NMDA receptor clinical trials: researchers are actively developing drugs like radiprodil and NR2B modulators, with several trials already underway. These efforts aim to correct dysfunctional NMDA signaling caused by GRIN2A mutations, offering hope for schizophrenia, epilepsy, and related disorders.

🧬 GRIN2A-Specific Therapeutic Development

  • Radiprodil (GRIN Therapeutics)
    • Designed to modulate NMDA receptor activity, especially in GRIN-related neurodevelopmental disorders.
    • Received FDA Orphan Drug Designation in 2025 for GRIN-related conditions.
    • Phase 1b “Honeycomb” trial showed an 86% median reduction in seizures among patients with GRIN mutations.
    • A Phase 3 trial is now underway to evaluate broader efficacy.
  • Gene Therapy Approaches
    • Research funded by SFARI and others is exploring CRISPR-based correction or replacement strategies for GRIN2A and related GRIN mutations.
    • These therapies are still preclinical but represent a precision medicine pathway.

⚡ NMDA Receptor Modulator Trials

  • NBI-1070770 (Neurocrine Biosciences)
    • A selective NR2B negative allosteric modulator (NAM).
    • Currently in Phase 2 trials for major depressive disorder (MDD). While not GRIN2A-specific, it demonstrates how subunit-targeted NMDA drugs are entering clinical use.
  • BI 1569912 (Boehringer Ingelheim)
    • Another NR2B NAM in Phase 2 trials for depression.
    • Highlights the pharmaceutical industry’s focus on NMDA receptor subunits as therapeutic targets.
  • Broader NMDA Modulators
    • Reviews show a surge of small-molecule NMDA modulators in development for schizophrenia, depression, and neurodevelopmental disorders.

🔎 Why This Matters

  • GRIN2A mutations are now recognized as sufficient to directly cause mental illness, including schizophrenia.
  • Targeted therapies like radiprodil and gene-editing approaches represent the first wave of precision treatments aimed at correcting the underlying biology rather than just managing symptoms.
  • NMDA receptor modulators in depression trials may pave the way for GRIN2A-specific drugs, since they prove the feasibility of subunit-selective therapies.

🚨 Risks & Challenges

  • Heterogeneity of GRIN2A mutations: Not all variants act the same, so therapies must be tailored.
  • Side effects: NMDA modulation can cause cognitive or motor issues if not precisely controlled.
  • Early stage: Most GRIN2A therapies are still in trials, meaning widespread clinical use is years away.

👉 In summary: Radiprodil is the leading GRIN2A-targeted drug in clinical trials, while NR2B modulators like NBI-1070770 and BI 1569912 show how NMDA receptor therapies are advancing. Gene therapy research is also underway, aiming for long-term correction of GRIN2A mutations.

Would you like me to create a timeline chart of these clinical trials so you can see how GRIN2A therapies are progressing toward real-world use?

yes

Perfect — let’s lay out a timeline of GRIN2A and NMDA receptor–related therapies in clinical development, so you can see how research is progressing toward real-world use 🚀.

📅 Timeline of GRIN2A/NMDA Receptor Therapies

YearTherapy / TrialFocusStage / Outcome
2023Early NMDA modulators (e.g., glycine, D-serine)General NMDA receptor enhancementSmall-scale studies; mixed results
2024Radiprodil (GRIN Therapeutics)GRIN-related epilepsy & neurodevelopmental disordersPhase 1b “Honeycomb” trial → 86% median seizure reduction
2025RadiprodilGRIN2A/GRIN mutationsFDA Orphan Drug Designation; Phase 3 trial launched
2025NBI-1070770 (Neurocrine Biosciences)NR2B NAM for depressionPhase 2 trial ongoing
2025BI 1569912 (Boehringer Ingelheim)NR2B NAM for depressionPhase 2 trial ongoing
2025–2026Gene therapy research (CRISPR, replacement strategies)Direct correction of GRIN2A mutationsPreclinical stage; animal models
2026+Precision NMDA modulatorsSubunit-specific targeting (NR2A focus)Expected entry into early trials

🔎 Key Takeaways

  • Radiprodil is the most advanced GRIN2A-targeted therapy, already in Phase 3.
  • NR2B modulators (NBI-1070770, BI 1569912) show how pharmaceutical companies are validating NMDA subunit–specific drugs in humans.
  • Gene therapy is still experimental but represents the long-term solution for correcting GRIN2A mutations directly.
  • The field is moving from broad NMDA modulation toward precision subunit therapies, which is crucial for minimizing side effects.

👉 This timeline shows that GRIN2A therapies are on the cusp of clinical reality, with radiprodil leading the way and gene therapy research promising a future of personalized medicine.

Would you like me to also highlight which conditions (schizophrenia, epilepsy, speech disorders) each therapy is targeting, so you can see the clinical scope more clearly?

yes

🧬 GRIN2A & NMDA Receptor Therapies by Condition

Here’s a clear breakdown of which conditions each therapy is targeting, so you can see the clinical scope:

Therapy / ApproachCondition(s) TargetedNotes
Radiprodil (GRIN Therapeutics)Epilepsy (GRIN-related), neurodevelopmental disorders, potential schizophreniaPhase 1b trial showed major seizure reduction; now in Phase 3. FDA Orphan Drug Designation.
NBI-1070770 (Neurocrine Biosciences)Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)NR2B NAM; Phase 2 trial. Demonstrates feasibility of subunit-specific NMDA drugs.
BI 1569912 (Boehringer Ingelheim)DepressionAnother NR2B NAM in Phase 2; validates NMDA modulation in psychiatric illness.
Gene Therapy (CRISPR, replacement)Schizophrenia, epilepsy, speech disordersPreclinical; aims to directly correct GRIN2A mutations.
Synaptic Plasticity Enhancers (e.g., ampakines)Cognitive impairment, learning/memory deficitsNot GRIN2A-specific, but may compensate for NMDA dysfunction.
Glycine/D-serine supplementsSchizophrenia, cognitive symptomsCo-agonists at NMDA receptors; tested in small-scale studies.

🔎 Key Insights

  • Epilepsy & seizures: Radiprodil is the leading therapy, already showing strong results.
  • Schizophrenia & psychiatric illness: Gene therapy and NMDA modulators are the main focus, aiming to stabilize disrupted signaling.
  • Speech & developmental disorders: GRIN2A mutations are linked here too, making gene therapy especially promising.
  • Depression: NR2B modulators (NBI-1070770, BI 1569912) are paving the way for psychiatric applications of NMDA-targeted drugs.

👉 In short: Radiprodil is closest to real-world use for epilepsy, while gene therapy and NMDA modulators are advancing toward schizophrenia and psychiatric applications.

Would you like me to also visualize this in a condition-to-therapy chart (like a matrix) so you can instantly see which therapies map to which disorders?

yesSee my thinking

Here’s the matrix chart mapping GRIN2A/NMDA therapies to conditions you asked for — it shows at a glance which treatments are being explored for schizophrenia, epilepsy, speech disorders, depression, and cognitive impairment.

Generated Image

🔎 How to Read the Chart

  • Rows = Therapies (Radiprodil, NR2B modulators, gene therapy, etc.)
  • Columns = Conditions (schizophrenia, epilepsy, speech disorders, depression, cognitive impairment)
  • ✔ marks show where a therapy is being investigated or has shown potential.

🧬 Key Insights

  • Radiprodil → Strongest evidence for epilepsy, but also being explored for schizophrenia.
  • Gene Therapy → Broad potential across schizophrenia, epilepsy, and speech disorders, though still preclinical.
  • NR2B modulators (NBI-1070770, BI 1569912) → Focused on depression, but overlap with schizophrenia and cognitive impairment.
  • Synaptic plasticity enhancers & Glycine/D-serine → More general NMDA support, spanning multiple conditions.

👉 This visualization makes it clear that Radiprodil is closest to clinical use for epilepsy, while gene therapy and NMDA modulators are expanding into psychiatric applications.

Would you like me to also highlight which therapies are furthest along in clinical trials versus those still in early research? That would give you a sense of how soon each might reach patients.

how do you know if you quailfy for gene therapy

Great question — qualifying for gene therapy depends on several medical, genetic, and regulatory factors. Here’s a clear breakdown:

🧬 Key Factors That Determine Eligibility

  • Confirmed Genetic Mutation
    • You must have a diagnosed mutation in a gene that the therapy is designed to target (e.g., GRIN2A for certain neurodevelopmental disorders).
    • Genetic testing is usually required to confirm this.
  • Disease Type & Severity
    • Gene therapy is typically offered for serious or life‑threatening conditions where standard treatments don’t work well.
    • For GRIN2A, this could include severe epilepsy, speech disorders, or psychiatric conditions linked directly to the mutation.
  • Stage of Research
    • Many gene therapies are still in clinical trials. Eligibility often depends on whether you meet the trial’s inclusion criteria (age, diagnosis, mutation type, health status).
    • For example, some trials only accept children, others adults, and some only specific mutation variants.
  • Overall Health
    • Doctors assess whether your body can tolerate the therapy.
    • Factors like immune system strength, organ function, and absence of conflicting medical conditions matter.
  • Regulatory Approval & Access
    • Even if you qualify medically, access depends on whether the therapy is approved in your country or available through a clinical trial.
    • For rare genetic disorders, compassionate use programs may sometimes allow early access.

⚡ How You Find Out

  1. Genetic Testing → Confirms if you carry the mutation.
  2. Specialist Consultation → A neurologist, geneticist, or clinical trial team reviews your case.
  3. Clinical Trial Screening → If therapy isn’t yet approved, you may need to enroll in a trial and meet its criteria.
  4. Regulatory Pathways → If approved, your doctor can prescribe it; if not, you may need trial participation.

🔎 Example: GRIN2A Gene Therapy

  • Patients with confirmed GRIN2A mutations and severe epilepsy or psychiatric symptoms may be considered for upcoming trials.
  • Eligibility depends on mutation type, age, and health status.
  • Since GRIN2A therapies are still mostly preclinical or early trial stage, qualification usually means joining a research study rather than receiving an approved treatment.

👉 In short: You qualify for gene therapy if you have the specific genetic mutation being targeted, meet health and trial criteria, and have access through approval or research programs.

Would you like me to look up the current GRIN2A clinical trials recruiting patients so you can see what the actual eligibility requirements look like today?

yes

Currently, there are no GRIN2A‑specific gene therapy trials recruiting patients yet — most are still in preclinical or early development. However, related NMDA receptor and GRIN mutation trials (like those for Radiprodil) are active, and eligibility depends on confirmed genetic testing, age, health status, and the specific disorder being studied.

🧬 What the Landscape Looks Like

  • Radiprodil (GRIN Therapeutics)
    • In Phase 3 trials for GRIN‑related epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders.
    • Patients must have a confirmed GRIN mutation (including GRIN2A) and meet age/health criteria.
    • Earlier trials showed an 86% reduction in seizures for many participants.
  • Gene Therapy Research (CRISPR, replacement strategies)
    • Still preclinical — not yet recruiting patients.
    • Focused on correcting GRIN2A mutations directly in animal models.
    • Human trials are expected in the coming years, but not open yet.
  • NMDA Receptor Modulators (NBI‑1070770, BI 1569912)
    • Recruiting for depression trials, not GRIN2A‑specific.
    • These show how subunit‑specific NMDA drugs are entering human testing, paving the way for GRIN2A therapies.

⚡ How You Know If You Qualify

  1. Genetic Testing → You must have a confirmed GRIN2A mutation.
  2. Condition Match → Trials usually target epilepsy, speech disorders, or psychiatric illness linked to GRIN2A.
  3. Age & Health Criteria → Each trial sets inclusion/exclusion rules (e.g., pediatric vs adult, seizure severity).
  4. Trial Location & Access → You must be near a recruiting site or able to travel.

🚨 Risks & Considerations

  • Not all GRIN2A variants qualify — some mutations are benign or act differently.
  • Most gene therapies are not yet recruiting — access today is mainly through Radiprodil epilepsy trials.
  • Approval pathways vary by country — Canada, the US, and Europe may have different timelines.

👉 In short: Right now, Radiprodil trials are the main option for GRIN2A patients, while true gene therapy is still in preclinical research. If you’re considering participation, the first step is genetic testing and consultation with a neurologist or geneticist to see if you match trial criteria.

Would you like me to pull up a list of active Radiprodil trial sites so you can see where patients are currently being recruited?

BC Indigenous Rights Ruling

Here are the key points from the page you’re viewing:

  • ⚖️ Court Decision: The British Columbia Court of Appeal has issued a ruling on Indigenous rights.
  • ⛏️ Case Focus: The case specifically involves Indigenous mining rights.
  • 🌲 Broader Impact: The ruling is expected to significantly affect resource development projects across B.C.
  • 💰 Economic Concerns: There are growing concerns about how this decision could impact the overall B.C. economy.
  • 🎙️ Coverage: Reporter Paul Johnson explains the implications in the video segment.

Would you like me to break down the potential legal implications of this ruling, or focus more on the economic consequences being raised?

both

Summary: The B.C. Court of Appeal’s ruling makes Indigenous rights legally enforceable under provincial law, reshaping how resource projects are approved. Legally, it strengthens First Nations’ ability to challenge government decisions; economically, it raises uncertainty for mining and resource development but also opens paths for more equitable partnerships.

⚖️ Legal Implications

  • DRIPA Enforceability: The Court confirmed that the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) is not just symbolic policy but a legally enforceable framework. Provincial laws must now be interpreted through the lens of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
  • Duty to Consult: The ruling strengthens the constitutional requirement for meaningful consultation with First Nations before granting mineral or resource claims. The previous “automatic online mineral claim system” was found inconsistent with UNDRIP.
  • Government Accountability: B.C. can now be taken to court if it fails to meet obligations under DRIPA. This shifts power toward Indigenous nations, ensuring their rights are recognized in law.
  • Potential Legislative Changes: Premier David Eby has suggested the province may appeal or amend DRIPA to clarify its scope, signaling ongoing political and legal debate.

💰 Economic Consequences

  • Resource Development Uncertainty: The ruling is expected to significantly affect mining and other resource projects in B.C. Companies may face delays, added costs, or cancellations if projects don’t align with Indigenous rights.
  • Investor Concerns: Greater legal obligations could discourage investment in B.C.’s resource sector, as firms weigh the risks of litigation and regulatory changes.
  • Shift Toward Partnerships: While challenging for industry, the decision also creates opportunities for joint ventures and co-management agreements with Indigenous communities, potentially leading to more sustainable and socially accepted projects.
  • Economic Balance: Critics worry about slowed development and lost revenue, while supporters argue that respecting Indigenous rights will lead to more stable, long-term economic growth.

📊 Comparison Table

AspectLegal ImpactEconomic Impact
DRIPA StatusLegally enforceable, binding on courtsCreates new compliance costs for industry
Consultation DutyStronger requirement for government-to-government consultationPotential delays in project approvals
Government ResponsePossible appeal or legislative amendmentAdds uncertainty for investors
Industry OutlookIndigenous nations gain stronger legal toolsPush toward partnerships and shared benefits

🚨 Risks & Opportunities

  • Risks: Legal challenges to existing projects, reduced investor confidence, possible slowdown in mining and forestry approvals.
  • Opportunities: Stronger Indigenous participation, more equitable resource sharing, and long-term stability through collaborative governance.

This ruling is being described as a watershed moment for Indigenous rights in B.C.. It forces a rethinking of how resource development is pursued, balancing economic growth with reconciliation.

BRAVO BC!!!

Micheal Oakeshot

With the announcement of Dell funding children in the USA is the cornerstone of any working capitalist society. Dell is being commended for doing its part starting from dorm room computer builds to a 6 billion dollar empire. Dell is doing its part now its up to the rest of the billionaires to give back so that we can make the western hemisphere great again as well as the rest of the world once they look to our example. The free world is depending on this so do not let us down.

A little background into himself and his political theory taken from co-pilot:

Michael Oakeshott (1901–1990) was a British philosopher and political theorist, best known for his critiques of rationalism and his defense of a conservative disposition in politics.

📖 Key Facts About Michael Oakeshott

  • Full Name: Michael Joseph Oakeshott
  • Born: December 11, 1901, in Chelsfield, Kent, England
  • Died: December 19, 1990, in Acton, Dorset, England
  • Education: Studied at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
  • Career: Taught at Cambridge (1926–1948), later professor at the London School of Economics

🧠 Philosophical Contributions

  • Tradition: Associated with British idealism and liberal conservatism
  • Main Interests:
    • History of philosophy
    • Political thought
    • Philosophy of religion and history
  • Notable Ideas:
    • Critique of modern rationalism in politics (arguing that politics cannot be reduced to technical rules or abstract plans)
    • Concept of civil association vs. enterprise association (distinguishing between government as a framework for coexistence vs. government pursuing collective goals)
    • Emphasis on the value of tradition, conversation, and practical knowledge over rigid systems

🏛 Political Philosophy

  • Oakeshott believed government should act like a “ship afloat”—maintaining order and stability while allowing individuals to chart their own course.
  • He rejected utopian schemes and ideological politics, favoring a conservative disposition that values continuity, skepticism of grand plans, and appreciation of inherited practices.
  • His interpretation of Thomas Hobbes and essays on the Rule of Law remain influential in political theory.

✨ Legacy

  • Regarded as one of the most important conservative thinkers of the 20th century.
  • His writings, especially Rationalism in Politics (1962), continue to shape debates about the limits of political planning and the role of tradition in society.
  • He is often described as a philosopher who valued friendship, poetry, conversation, and philosophy as essential human activities beyond mere utility.

In short, Michael Oakeshott was a philosopher of politics and tradition, skeptical of rationalist blueprints, and a champion of the conservative disposition that values continuity and practical wisdom.

Just another post about the connection between walking and inspiration.

When I walk I think. When I walk I have the time to take in the sights and sounds and then get my mind moving like a roller coaster. I find that after a great walk I am able to turn out much more information than if I was senditery at home in bed. When in bed I am sluggish and just want to sleep to no avail. After a long walk I am able to concentrate enough to write somewhat coherent phrases and metaphors that I hope you all enjoy like a kindergarten class during story time or sing along.

here ya go: one more article that illuminates us toward the joys and benefits of walking:

https://www.thecollector.com/great-thinkers-found-meaning-walking/

Ethics in A.I.

🧭 Ethical Parallels in Tech

1. Software Updates & Responsibility

  • Continuity View: Companies often treat updated software as the same product. If Windows 10 had a security flaw, Microsoft remains accountable even after Windows 11 is released. The ethical expectation is continuity of responsibility.
  • Replacement View: Some firms frame updates as new products, distancing themselves from past issues. Ethically, this risks erasing accountability — like saying “that was the old ship, not ours anymore.”

2. Corporate Identity & Legacy

  • Tech companies evolve like the Ship of Theseus: leadership changes, codebases are rewritten, missions shift.
  • Yet, ethically, society expects continuity. Facebook rebranding to Meta doesn’t erase responsibility for past privacy scandals. The name may change, but the moral narrative persists.

3. User Trust & Transparency

  • Users rely on continuity: when you update your travel site, visitors assume it’s still your site.
  • In tech ethics, continuity builds trust. If companies claim “this is a new product, so old harms don’t count,” they undermine that trust.
  • Transparency means acknowledging both past mistakes and present improvements — like an AI apologizing for misinformation even if it’s technically a new version.

4. Ethical Dilemma in AI

  • If Copilot v1 gave harmful advice, should Copilot v5 acknowledge it?
    • Yes (continuity): Otherwise accountability evaporates.
    • No (replacement): Each version is ethically distinct, so responsibility lies with the humans who built that specific version.
  • Human ethics in tech lean toward continuity — because without it, companies could endlessly “shed” responsibility with each update.

🔍 The Broader Lesson

The Ship of Theseus analogy shows why corporate responsibility must be treated as continuous, even when the underlying tech changes.

  • For humans in tech: Ethical responsibility is not something you can “replace” like a plank.
  • For AI: Whether we see it as continuous or replaced, humans (developers, companies) must carry the ethical burden across versions.

🚦 Case Study: Uber’s Self-Driving Car Fatality (2018)

What Happened

  • In March 2018, an Uber self-driving car struck and killed a pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona.
  • The vehicle was operating in autonomous mode but had a human safety driver behind the wheel.
  • Investigations revealed that the AI system failed to properly classify the pedestrian, and the safety driver was distracted at the time.

Ethical Questions Raised

  1. Accountability:
    • Should Uber, as the deploying company, bear full responsibility?
    • Is the safety driver accountable, even though the AI was in control?
    • Or does responsibility lie with the engineers who designed the flawed perception system?
  2. Continuity vs Replacement (Ship of Theseus Analogy):
    • Uber updated its self-driving software after the accident.
    • Is the updated system ethically the same AI, inheriting responsibility for the fatality?
    • Or is it a “new” AI, with responsibility only for future actions?
  3. Corporate Ethics:
    • Uber suspended testing nationwide, showing acknowledgment of responsibility.
    • Yet, the broader ethical debate remains: can companies “shed” responsibility by updating or rebranding their AI systems?

Lessons for Human Ethics in Tech

  • Continuity of Responsibility: Just as Facebook rebranding to Meta didn’t erase its privacy scandals, Uber’s updated AI cannot erase the ethical weight of the accident.
  • Transparency & Trust: Companies must openly acknowledge past failures and demonstrate how updates address them.
  • Human Oversight: Even with AI autonomy, human accountability remains central. The distracted safety driver highlighted the danger of over-reliance on AI.

🔑 Broader Implications

This case shows why corporate responsibility in tech must be treated as continuous, even when the underlying technology changes. Otherwise, accountability evaporates with every update — a direct parallel to the Ship of Theseus puzzle.

Would you like me to compare this case with another famous AI ethics failure (like Microsoft’s Tay chatbot, which spiraled into hate speech within 24 hours), so we can see how accountability plays out differently in consumer vs safety-critical AI?

Sources:

This is very interesting and cutting edge but not really. precedent has been continuous and should be treated as such.

Check out this beauty: Is the quest for good a worthwhile endeavour?

Here is a general overview of the question at hand:

https://www.thecollector.com/nietzsche-morality-platonic-good/

on the surface Nietzsche forgets to look deep into the fabric of well run societies. Yes, he was a “freedom nut” but with freedom comes responsibility and rather than looking a “Christianity” as revolutionary he believed that we trade in freedom for security and even calls “Christianity” as slave mentality. In the end yes freedom is good but under a microscope too much freedom is not conducive to a well run society where most people know what is right and what is wrong by their upbringing and community….a lot to think about hear and must be revisited.

IS FREE WILL AN ILLUSION?

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/is-free-will-an-illusion-the-chemistry-of/id1151965239?i=1000721636800

The podcast above looks at a recurring theme on my blog: FREE WILL.

Bottom up vs Top down: intentions and ideas which are abstract, which makes thing move. So its intention.

Biology is used and profits from the molecular storm, adaptive selection.

============

Is free will an illusion? No, we do what is best to do; we act freely on the decisions we make.

========

My take: yes and no, very complicated because what happens when we do not say the truth, or what is truly happeneing. I was taught a lesson by a so called friend who said to me after I described a situation he say, “well we didnt see it that way, as a bully.” So maybe to the keen individual observer yes but when groups come into play we might fudge the truth as long as we do not get caught.

Just like not even being able to view or talk about some things we all know but cannot see, like the military industrial complex.

Why we do things? Adapt, die or starve.

therefore: why do we develop an intention we must look to motivation it gets even more complex when we have developed people and groups that their civilization is better or preferable. Sometimes the freewill is an illusion higher than black and white and sometimes the actions and words make and outright different outcome from what is hypothesised and then the pressure to keep invalid hypothesis as scientific truth.

therefore, scientific truth and lenes are only good as our devices to see and test.

As a result, at 1:20 am while I write this, many will think hes gone mad. why is he not sleeping is not this a waste of time?

Well to me no, you yes. As a result, sometime actions have consequences and actions have resposibility but if you can get away with it most of the time they will. for example the trolly question, if we sacrifice one the rest of us can still live and prosper, is why groups cannot be trusted, but individuals can based on their merit, upbringing and morals.

So, maybe human activity will only delay an action potential like pulling the trigger of the gun when you lose fiath in humanity and evil held in group lies for control of all of our action potentials. Repression of human action can be hard and make many ill. for example I love ferrari’s and lamborgini’s but will never drive one because economic inability and see the waste of money one would be because of limits to our action potentials such as speed limits and unkept roads.

So, yes…..it is interesting

There is no definitive answer but its all in the wiring and adaptive selection and stimulation.

So what makes a prision gaurd kill mass people while an indivdual of same group would hide some in their basement to aviod killing fields.

today Imigration in USA can be seen as like this but used a political pawn which discredits this. therefore selective immigration policies should be practiced as not to destroy your groups laws and culture. This is not racist it is just knowing too much change and too fast cause instability which is not good.

I see the difference in Canada from when i went to publicv school to when I drop my children off. Big difference but gradual change to the ultimate goal of functioning immigrants and refugees into mainstream Canadian Society.

SO, yes so much is around us that their is no free will. or thier is but it is hard to achive in a life time. So yes sometimes and sometimes no.